Bishop’s Circular on Land deal Circular Issued by Bishop Sebastian Edayanthrathu

 

Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Ernakulam–Angamaly

 on the Controversial Land Deal

 

 James kottoor     (Note: Bishop Edayanthrathu the Auxiliary was entrusted with writing this letter by the Cardinal to inform the priests the detailed facts of the land sale. So CCV is publishing it for the information of the general public, also to prevent spread of rumours based on tell-tale information. james kottoor, editor ccv)

 

December 28, 2017, Prot. No. CR-6/17

Loving, respected priests,

At the clergy conference of the archdiocese of Ernakulam-Angamaly held on December 21, 2017, we discussed the issues regarding the purchase and sale of land in the archdiocese. At the end of the conference, I was entrusted with the responsibility of informing all the priests the truth about the issues through a circular. Accordingly, I inform you about the facts related to the financial crisis facing the archdiocese.

  1. On May 29, 2015, the archdiocese bought 23.22 acres of land, adjacent to the Little Flower Hospital at Mattoor in Thuravoor village to set up a medical college. For this a loan of Rs 60 crore was obtained from the bank. The archdiocese, which does not have much surplus fund, bought this land in the belief that it would be able to sell the archdiocese’s land at Varantharapalli and repay the loan.
  1. However, the land at Varantharapalli could not be sold. As a result, the Finance Council of the archdiocese felt that it was very difficult for the archdiocese to pay the annual interest of Rs 6 crore on the bank loan of Rs 60 crore.
  2. As the archdiocese had bought 23.22 acres of land in its own territory, it was thought feasible to sell some other plots of land belonging to the archdiocese and clear the debt. These are the five plots of land selected for sale:

             a) 70.15 cents of land in front of Naipunya School at Kochi (Trikkakara)

b) 62.33 cents in front of the Trikkakara Bharat Mata College

c)  99.44 cents near Trikkakara Karunalayam

d) 20.35 cents at Nilampathinjimukal, Kakkanad

e) 54.71 cents at Marad

  1. Thus, the total land that was decided to be sold measured 306.98 cents. The    price that was decided for various plots of land varied from Rs 19 lakh per cent to Rs 3 lakh per cent. The average price of land to be sold worked out to Rs 9.05 lakh per cent.
  1.  Under the agreement reached with the person who was entrusted with the    responsibility of selling the land, he should not have divided the plots and sold them to a third party or parties. However, the documents suggest that the land was given to 36 persons in violation of the agreement.
  1. The archdiocese was under the impression that the five above-mentioned plots would be sold in a month’s time and the archdiocese would get Rs 27.30 crore. When that money is deposited in the bank, the archdiocese would be left with a debt of only Rs 32 crore. The decisions were taken in the belief that the rental income from the soon-to-be completed shopping complex at Chakkaraparambil would be sufficient to meet the needs of paying the bank’s interest and clearing the principal amount.
  1. The five plots of land measuring 301.76 cents, excluding 5.22 cents earmarked for a road, were sold under 36 title deeds. Under the agreement signed on June 21, 2016, the financial transactions regarding the land sale should have been completed in one month. Yet, the archdiocese received only Rs 9.13 crore even after one and a half years.
  1. The balance of Rs 18.17 is yet to be received. Although the decision to sell the five plots of land was discussed in the canonical councils of the archdiocese, they were not taken into confidence when the land was divided and sold under 36 title deeds. Not only that, even before the subject was to be discussed in the canonical councils, advance amounts were believed to have been obtained from the buyers of the land.
  1. If, after the purchase of the land at Mattoor, the liability of the archdiocese stood at Rs 60 core, it has now increased to Rs 84 crore after the above-mentioned land transactions.
  1. What has happened to the archdiocese is not just a financial crisis. Also involved are moral issues of lack of transparency and non-adherence to canonical laws. Thus, even if the archdiocese is able to receive the balance amount due to it, it would solve the financial problems only to some extent. The moral issues would, however, remain intact.
  1. Realising the grave situation and in accordance with the decision of the clergy council held on November 29, 2017, the head of the archdiocese appointed a six-member committee to study the issue in detail. The interim report of the committee was presented before the various bodies prior to the clergy conference held on December 21, 2017. The committee has been asked to submit its final report before January 31, 2018.
  1. The clergy council and the clergy conference want the final report to be sent to the Vatican. On the basis of the interim report and in accordance with the directions given by Cardinal George Alencherry, the responsibilities of Monsignor Sebastian Vadakumpadan, who is the Synchellus in charge of all the establishments in the archdiocese, and Fr Joshi Puthuva, who is the financial officer of the archdiocese, have been controlled.

The details given above are based on the documents and information regarding the financial crisis facing the archdiocese as a result of the land transactions. I submit them to the knowledge of the respected priests. There is no need to read out the circular in the parishes.

Hope everyone would stand united and sincerely pray and work to find a permanent solution to all the crises facing the archdiocese.

Yours in love and prayers

Mar Sebastian Edayanthrathu

Protosynchellus, Ernakulam-Angamali Archdiocese

 

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Sebastian Kakkanad says:

    This travesty is nothing new. These kinds of 'deals' and unscrupulous attempt to steal church's wealth has been going on for eons. Now, that an outsider was also involved. So they cannot hide it anymore. Not just that, later on they have to make an appeal to the 'FAITHFOOLS' to dish out more to cover the losses.

  2. George Thomas says:

    We people of arch diocese will raise the amount necessary to buy back our asset…already sold out for megire sum…

     

    Can  cardinal or bishop house take steps for the same…

     

    Don't loose our traditional asset for peanut price…don't ruin credibility of church, morally and financially…

     

    We can raise money to buy back….

  3. Alan Doulton says:

    This is the same archdiocese that built a church costing Rs 50 crore.

    This is poor governance, leading to fraud – bishops are not trained to handle such matters, they rely on the wrong people and have no checks and balances in place.

    My latest note will be sent to you in a week. Have sent it to the  nuncio and the CCBI, CBCI . Will wait for one week to see their response

    Alan

  4. Isaac Gomes says:

    Mar Sebastian Edayanthrathu writes in his letter that "at the clergy conference of the archdiocese of Ernakulam-Angamaly held on December 21, 2017". Is it the Archdiocesan Finance Committee? What is its composition? How many members of the Laity comprised this committee? 

    Also the meeting was held after the damage was done. So it was basically a damage control exercise in futility because the land deal into 36 plots (instead of 5 plots as reportedly intended) was already done in a surreptitious manner. The million dollar question is how can one single man do all the damage if he was not backed by the Church authorities of Ernakulum Archdiocese?

    Also when it was found that the said person with whom the land sale agreement was signed by the Archdiocese, had broken the deal to suit his way, the whole agreement of land sale should have been scrapped ab initio. 

    The Vatican has no locus standi to decide on sale of land in India. It is a matter of law of the land. Therefore Mar Sebastian's observation in his letter that "The clergy council and the clergy conference want the final report to be sent to the Vatican" is nothing but a roose to hoodwink the laity, who had donated the original land (or money to buy the 5 plots) to the Archdiocese. The Archdiocese of Ernakulam has failed miserably as Custodians of the Church property and they are accountable to the Laity.

    Though only one man is being blamed for the miscarriage of the land deal, there are many more hiding behind him. Only legal resource will help bring the culprits to book.

    In this respect, the very initial address of Mar Sebastian is wrong. He has only addressed his priest friends and not the members of the Laity, the actual owners.

    However one must appreciate Mar Sebastian for his courage to come public. It seems this is the first time, a confession like this has happened. 

    Had the Vatican II mandate of Parish Finance Committee (PFC) been implemented in each parish (CBCI is blissfully sleeping on this matter of structural reform and harping only on atrocities) , this scam or catastrphe could have been avoided.

  5. 7th January 2018

    Why and how the 5 pcs of property were sold without getting the so called Rs 27 crore? This is very unusual. Who is that person??

    Joe Mullappallil

  6. 7th January 2018

    Thank you Dr.James Kottoor for your update. It is the grand old game they are playing. At least we know one side of the story. The question is "WHERE IS THE REST OF THE MONEY?" and what happened in between??? Who is responsible????

    Hope the laity will get the answer,

    WE NEED OUR PALLI YOGAMS BACK, WE CAN'T TRUST these guys any more.

    Thank you

    Jacob Kallupura Esq.

    Boston

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

17 + 7 =