In the pic:  Cardinal Dolan gives opening prayer at Trump's Republican National Convention on August 24, 2020. tragic comedy in the Catholic Church all over is SIN  centered round SEX. It is defined and taught by a celibate clerical class who claim to have a hotline to God almighty. What is worse, it is for the practice of the laity, not the celibate clergy! In this the tragedy is the LAITY are the ones sinned against than the CLERGY who should be the right target!

We quoted many times many self-evident truths and wrote too much ad nausea things like: “The Titanic called the Church (which even a God cannot sink) is sinking, all due to the tsunami called Clergy-sex, at the top echelons of power – Cardinals and Bishops! And SOS are flying thick and fast.” Examples? Cardinals Macharic of Washington, laicized, Pell of Melbone, Franco Mulakkal and Bish,William of Mysore under investigation, India; no place here to name all, you know them all, don’t you.

Who created sin?

I heard it first some 60 years ago at Hydepark corner, London, when a Sopbox orataor asked: Who created SIN and answered: “The Canon Law of the Catholic Church!” Listen for a change to our world famous Vivekananda: “Never ever dare to call MAN the crown and glory of creation a SINNR on the concluding day of creation!” He created all thing GOOD, and on the final day he bungled?

In all moral matters the final authority is your own ‘commanding conscience’ not any clergy man, (don’t worry soon there will be women priests!) and the dictates of Conscience will be far above the teaching authority of the Church or Popes (ailing Pope Benedict) and what about our reigning Pappa Francis? 

God’s name is MERCY!

“All will be saved, even the worst criminals who make your life a HELL on earth, because the name of our GOD is MERCY unalloyed, so give communion to every divorced and remarried who ask, he had said and he gave it to his country’s President and his girl friend! And what did Jesus teach and do?

Didn’t he say: “The drunkards and prostitutes will enter heaven before any high  priests and  Pharisees” whom he called hypocrites, whitewashed sepulchers and brood of vipers? (a bit too much, wasn’t he?) Then wasn’t he(Jesus) called a ‘Bastard, Son of a Bitch etc.’ the name given to any one without a known earthly father! Of course not without a grain of truth either, nor is any one at fault for getting born so! Least of all Jesus!

Energy uncreated?

Do you know of any woman impregnated by any god, Christian or non-Christian? Know of or met any gods, millions of them having their sway in all religions? The atheists are excluded from this question! I haven’t met any in my 86 years of sojourn in this vale of tears except the proponents of Quantum theory that ENERGY uncreated and indestructible sustains everything. I am trying to digest it hoping against hope at the fag end of my leif! Yesterday an young man Varkey, a close friend, hard worker and neighbor died of hart attack, not Corona. Those who want to live long die fast, those wanting to die soon live long (Me)!

The article below is  all about American elections where the battle lines are between pro and anti-life conceptions in the womb. Outside the womb they care too hoots; the rule is to  establish WASP(White anglosaxon Protestnt) or white supremacy) white supremacy, black lives don’t matter, they are fodder for gun culture! We can only fondly hope, this will not go against a Catholic Biden’s prospects! In India for the poor villagers, their only affordable “recreation is procreation”, possibly to get a male child to work and maintain the harth burning!

Battle lines in India!

Of course Sanjay Gandi resorted to sterilization targeting Muslims and sterilized himself through a free fall from the heavens! Modiji is doing one better and wiser by dumping triple TALAK! Only it is aimed at reducing the birth rate among Muslims, not to give equality to all Indians irrespective of religion and caste, not colour as in US. Here the battle lines are between Ram Raj and secularism or Indian citizenship. Here the supreme commander and the High Priest are rolled into one! Religion takes the central public space, not private!

Listen to a Lady Theologian!

I have already written a mouthful and mindful as an introductory note. You should rather listen to a more erudite  Dr. Mary Hunt, a Catholic lady feminist theologian who gives some sharp practical advise to our patriarchal paternalists, therefore indocile bishops! Who knows, at least some of them may decide, they are not too old to learn! james kottoor, editor ccv. read below theologian Mary Hunt on Theological Mistakes!

The facts do not seem to be in dispute: a man from Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil raped his ten-year-old niece. By the time her pregnancy was discovered, her local jurisdiction declared that she was four days over the limit and the fetus was scant grams over the weight permitted for an abortion. She was transported 1000 miles to Recife, Pernambuco where she had an abortion as allowed under the circumstances by Brazilian law. 

In a decent, just world, the perpetrator of this morally reprehensible act of rape and incest would be tried, found guilty, and sent to prison for psychiatric help and personal rehabilitation. The child involved, who reported that her uncle had raped her repeatedly since she was six, would receive the medical treatment she needed, the psychological care she deserved, and the privacy to deal with it. Instead, the little girl was denied local medical attention on a technicality. She had to travel a great distance which meant that her pregnancy was further along by the time she actually had the abortion. 

People gathered outside the hospital to express their views in favor of and against the procedure. An anti-abortion advocate, who had worked in President Bolsonaro’s Ministry of Women, Family and Human Rights, revealed the child’s name in the press. Her young life, already turned upside down, was turned inside out. 

I observe this case from a distance. But it resonates with other such heinous examples of patriarchal thinking and doing that are common in the United States. The US is embroiled in deadly struggles because of systemic racism, a health crisis far beyond the magnitude of the virus in other developed countries because, like Brazil, the U.S. government’s response has been inadequate and absurd. Thirty million people are unemployed while the stock market is surging upward. So to hear Catholic religious leaders rail about abortion is to witness theological mistakes in the making. 

Three years into the Trump government, anti-choice rhetoric is baptized and confirmed by religious sycophants like Timothy Cardinal Dolan. U.S. Catholic bishops pass over Trump’s egregious immigration policies, economic injustice to people made poor, and racist rhetoric simply because the President professes to be anti-abortion. This singular focus on the fetus makes bad situations like that of the little girl in Brazil much worse. I’ve seen these dynamics play out repeatedly, with Catholic bishops intervening to fuel the fires rather than acting like pastors. Their suitability for ministry is in deep question. 

In the recent Brazilian case, Archbishop Walmor Oliveira de Azevedo Belo Horizonte, the president of National Conference of Bishops of Brazil (CNBB), opined: “Sexual violence is terrible, but the violence of the abortion is unjustifiable, considering all existing resources available to guarantee the lives of both children.” I beg to differ with him. Sexual violence and all that surrounds it is so terrible that abortion is not only justified, but to be recommended in this case despite whatever resources might be available for the child (singular) involved. A grievous crime is only made worse by the theological analysis and priorities that extend the suffering and give the wrong message about what’s at stake.

First, the primary ethical issue in this case isn’t abortion but sexual violence. It wasn’t a one-off thing, but, according to the child, the uncle sexually abused her for years. Where were the bishops then? The courts will decide guilt or innocence of the perpetrator, but the reality is that no ten-year-old should even know what sexual assault is, much less how long they’ve experienced it. What happened to her was evil. 

Pregnancy at age 10, which is at least a year before many girls even begin to menstruate, is a biological and psychological event for which no child is prepared. There aren’t enough resources in the world to justify burdening a child with that experience. The issue at hand is the well-being of a child who’s in a physical and psychological state of extreme vulnerability. Focus on that child helps to prioritize what to do and why. Recourse to abstract concepts like “right to life,” “abortion on demand,” and “fetus is a person” skew the theological conversation away from the pastoral reality at hand and toward a patriarchal parochial norm that violates the pregnant woman once again.

To be clear, there is only one child abused in this case, not two as the bishops would have it. The fetus is simply not a child no matter how much the bishops wish that were the case. There is no consensus on when life begins, but there is consensus that children are to be nurtured not violated. A fetus is part of the reality here, but it is not a person and there is an important difference. 

Second, contra the Archbishop and his fellows, abortion is more than justified in this instance. In fact, justification is not necessary, as ethicist Rebecca Todd Peters spells out clearly in her insightful book, Trust Women: A Progressive Christian Argument for Reproductive Justice.   Women have been coerced into ‘justifying’ their reproductive choices for generations even when they’re raped. It’s the unpregnant Catholic bishops who need to justify having the nerve to do anything but support this child at her time of deep distress. Given that none of them will be involved in raising a child who would result from this crime, they have no right to proclaim what the person most deeply affected should do.

Now that the girl’s name is public, it would simply be a matter of time before the offspring would be known publicly, an unspeakable burden to impose on any child and family. No one can say with certainty when human life begins. But we can say with absolute certainty when humane treatment ends. Forcing a child to bring a pregnancy to term against her wishes and well-being is clearly inhumane.

The bishops are the ones who need to ‘justify’ what moral standing they have to express an opinion, what ecclesial authority they possess to try to make their way normative. If they were to update their moral theology, they would learn that in postmodernity, when women are full and free members of society, women must evaluate and choose responses not in a vacuum but in the ravages of patriarchy. 

With a little study, the bishops would soon learn that abortion is viewed very differently when cast in contemporary scientific terms and in light of women’s oppression than when it’s seen in their medieval cosmology. A pregnancy is not a thing to be evaluated but a relationship to be respected in a family constellation of which bishops play no part. Poor, young women of color suffer abuse most often. There is no excuse to make it worse by ignoring the reality of women’s lives and the choices women make to survive. 

The bishops could learn a lot from SisterSong, women of color who advance a reproductive justice approach. Reproductive justice means “the human right to maintain personal bodily autonomy, have children, not have children, and parent the children we have in safe and sustainable communities.” This would help the bishops understand that there are many good choices, including abortion, in hard situations.

Third, child abuse is another factor in this case. I refer to the physical abuse of the young girl by her uncle. But I also refer to the abuse that anti-abortion activists heaped on her by revealing her name. They added stress to her young self by protesting the choice she, with her family, made. Those people abused her, forcing a private decision to be made public, a self-defense survival strategy cast as criminal activity. 

While these people act on their own, it is important to underscore that they’re informed and encouraged by Roman Catholic clergy who consider abortion the most important moral issue. The Brazilian bishops have a long history of this kind of rhetoric. But the U.S. bishops proclaimed abortion the “preeminent priority,” more important than economic injustice, racism, ecological disaster, war, and more. Such theological simplicity allows church officials to leave aside sexual violence, child abuse, racism, poverty, lack of healthcare and education, and so many other factors that go into a case like this. The bishops’ theology is missing an interstructured analysis which tough problems require. As a result, the bishops are complicit in the commission of grave mistakes. When governments and some in society take them seriously, their outdated approaches cost people dearly.

Finally, this tragic situation cannot be redeemed simply with analysis. Human care and compassion figure largely. Still, there are things we can learn going forward. One is that reproductive justice is a moral good. When further pain and suffering is avoided, when additional lives are spared devastating social stigmas, when men stop controlling women, justice accrues. When women are able to make choices that are best for themselves and their families, abortion and raising children are among the many ways women choose life. 

Theological mistakes are costly. The Brazilian bishops’ words ring hollow. They’ve perpetuated the ideology that abortion is worse than sexual assault, that it can never be justified, and that resources to raise children somehow mitigate the tragedy. In the real world, where young girls are raped, families are left to cope with the aftermath including another child to care for, and when children are abused, a theology of mercy, compassion, and justice grounded in the complex analysis of real social problems is required. (A Portuguese version of this article was published by Católicas pelo Direito de Decidir (Catholics for Choice) in Brazil. Mary E. Hunt:Mary E. Hunt, Ph.D., is a feminist theologian who is co-founder and co-director of the Women's Alliance for Theology, Ethics and Ritual (WATER) in Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. A Roman Catholic active in the women-church movement, she lectures and writes on theology and ethics with particular attention to liberation issues.

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. K.J. GEORGE says:


    Augustine's negative attitude toward human sexuality greatly stimulated the movement to require the compulsive celibacy of all Western clergy, another important cause of the conflict between Orthodoxy and the Roman Church.


    The Historic Church, an Orthodox view of Christian History, by John W. Morris


    ..for a monk to have, at least once in his life, experience of carnal passion, so that he can one day be indulgent  and understanding with the sinners he will counsel and console… well dear Adso, it is not  a thing to be wished before it happens, but it is not something to vituperate too much oncwe it has happened."

    The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco page 252



    I cannot convince myself, that God chose to introduce such a foul being into creation without also endowing it with some virtues; He granted her many privileges and motives of prestige, three of them very great indeed. If, then, the Lord showed such favour to Eve herself and to her daughters, is it so abnormal that we also should feel drawn by the graces and the nobility of that sex? it is not so monstrous that you were tempted to do it.

    Council of Vienne 1312








Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.