Enforce Gender equality in Church! Vatican editor who exposed sexual abuse of nuns!

 

Matters India

 

13 May 2019

 

Everything moves at snail’s pace in the Catholic church, in spite of the enormous amount of goodwill all over the world. The experience of Sr. Lucetta Scaraffia, explained in detail in the article below is living proof.

 

 Clerical sex abuse is today’s talk of the town (that is, in today’s Global village) seen and heard by all, but there is hardly anyone, bold enough to come forward to confront it head on. Hats off to the present writer. Scaraffia’s editorship was much like mine at the New Leader 50 years ago working without pay all through due to lack of money and no rest or holiday due to lack of time to finish my work for leisure or parties, therefore working 24 hours with a board behind my table in 12 column leader headline: “IF YOU HAVE TIME TO WASTE, KINDLY  DON’T WASTE IT HERE PLEASE.” I had a photo of it with Cardinal Parecattil and my own Archbishop Arulappa!

 

In today’s world the crowning glory of the  Catholic Church is the self-less, self-effacing foot-washing ministry proudly performed by the Catholic sisters, imitating the example of the saintly soul, Mother Teresa, but least acknowledged and appreciated – best example, least appreciated or openly admitted.

 

Diversionary Tactic

Clerical abuse of youngsters, now talked about everywhere, is the  best example of diverting the public attention to the least insignificant happening – youngsters don’t talk much nor are they taken seriously if they dare to speak – so that the elders, Pater-familias, escape being targeted to face the music of answering questions.

 

Late Pope Paul the VI raised the most pertinent question towards the end of the Vatican II, “where are the half of humanity – the womenfolk in the Church”. They have been made invisible, insignificant by the sleeping male dominated church headed by Peter, while the womenfolk led by Mary Magdaline was the first at the tomb of Jesus to greet the risen Lord with her endearing lover’s call: “Rabboni”.

 

Curse called ‘Male Domination’

Therefore Magdalene was declared the “Apostle par Excellence”. She went back to wake up the sleeping male battalion led by Peter and John, but John, being young, ran fast, but still waited to allow Peter to enter the tomb first to respect the “proto call”. Even today that ‘proto call’, giving prominence  and visibility to men folk at the expense of women – a curse, not a blessing – is weighing down the Catholic Church.

 

Therefore away with male domination; usher in gender equality, designed by the creator from the very  beginning, now enforced also by civil law.  It is  the only remedy to set right all  wrong inequalities enforced in the church, beginning with denial of priesthood for women. Who on earth can deny that it was a Lady, Mary who brought forth Jesus. Step up, we challenge all male folk in the Church, who is capable of delivering a child. If there is none, let the women take up the lead to become priests, also to bring Jesus on the altar sacramentally.

 

Is Mary most insulted?

A pregnant priest or a pregnant Pope is not an insult to priesthood. Otherwise  Mary should be the most insulted person in the world. Think of New Zealand PM and Benazir Bhutto who gave brith while being PMs; in the first instance of New Zealand, not even properly married. Are they today praised or blamed? Stop then this double talk as corrupt politicians do.

 

This scribe was away in Abu Dhabi  for nearly 3 months, to be near his daughter’s giving birth to her second child, a boy,  as Mary rushed to Elizabeth to assist at the birth of John the Baptist. Is that anything to be ashamed of?

 

Gender equality, top priority

Therefore the first principle to be enforced clearly in the Church is gender equality. If what God wanted was to remedy the loneliness of Adam, he should have created another MAN like himself and not a WOMAN. Man and woman are equal in God’s sight. Man without woman is incomplete, woman without man is incomplete, each without the other is only a peace of humanity incomplete! Who is that gentleman on earth to say NO. Let him stand up and prove his point, his ability to deliver!

 

There are any amount of things to be written. But please listen to the experience of Lucetta Scaraffia, to imitate her here and now today, not tomorrow, to bring down here on earth God’s vision of peace on earth through a family spirit of love and care  lived  here below, where there is no place for superiority or inferiority, but only a competition to serve, to be the first to do the foot-washing ministry. james kottoor, editor, CCV.

 

Please read below

Scaraffia’s enlightening article


 

On March 26, Lucetta Scaraffia sent a letter to Pope Francis. She was, at the time, the editor of the Vatican’s glossy women’s magazine Women Church World: a title that in its seven years had taken aim at misogyny in the church, exposed the shocking sexual abuse of nuns and the secret abortions priests had paid for to get rid of the evidence.

 

“We are throwing in the towel,” she told the pope. “Because we feel surrounded by an atmosphere of distrust and progressive delegitimisation.” The “we” was the 11-strong editorial team, all but two of whom quit on the same day, accusing the church elders of attempting to gag them. “A vital initiative has been reduced to silence and there has been a return to the antiquated and arid custom of choosing women considered trustworthy from on high, under the direct control of men.”

I meet Scaraffia, 70, in her home in the plush Parioli district of Rome. She is softly spoken, but strong-willed, maintaining that it was the right thing to do to leave the magazine. “We were free before, we got on with our work without any pressure. But in the end, they left no space for autonomy.”

A religious magazine that focused on women’s issues was Scaraffia’s idea to begin with. In 2007, she became the first female contributor to the Vatican’s daily newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano. L’Osservatore primarily covers the work of the pope and the Roman Catholic church, but she saw a space for a publication dedicated to women. It was proposed to Pope Benedict XVI, who gave his approval. “There are so many more women working within the church than there are men, doing interesting and intelligent things, but nobody knows about it,” Scaraffia says. “The magazine set out to give a voice to these women.”

 

Scaraffia’s editorship was bold; the more fearless she became, the more feathers she ruffled. A year or so into the magazine’s existence, she began to call out misogyny in the church. Then came an article in March 2018 that denounced the servitude of nuns who work for a pittance to cook and clean for clerics.

 

“This created so much embarrassment and hostility in the Catholic hierarchy as the priests thought it was their right to have an unpaid nun serving them. They believe that women become nuns to serve them; it’s a mistaken belief but is very much rooted within the church,” says Scaraffia. “Women become nuns because they have a vocation and want to help those who are suffering or fragile, not to serve priests.”

 

 

Scaraffia went a step further in February with a scathing account of the numerous cases of nuns being raped or abused by priests and bishops, or being forced to have an abortion or leave the church if they became pregnant as a result. A few days after the article was published, Pope Francis acknowledged the issue of widespread abuse against nuns for the first time. He said more needed to be done to confront the issue, while pointing to the action taken by Pope Benedict XVI against a French order after nuns there had been reduced to “sexual slavery” by priests.

 

 

But, so far, there has been little evidence, at least publicly, of steps being taken to address the issue. “Nothing has been done, because there is the issue of nuns being forced into abortion [by clerics who rape and impregnate them]. The priests pay for them to have an abortion – if that is further exposed it would be very bad, and so they keep silent,” she says.

 

Scaraffia and her team never took salaries. All maintained other jobs – Scaraffia as a history professor at Rome’s Sapienza University – and were only paid for the articles they produced. “We were a very close group,” she says. “We discussed the important themes for women today, we read, we spoke to people. It was a profound job.”A few days after Scaraffia’s article, Pope Francis acknowledged widespread abuse against nuns for the first time.

 

We sit in Scaraffia’s living room, where books line almost every inch of the walls. She was brought up a Catholic but stopped going to church when she started university. She wouldn’t return to religion until after the birth of her daughter in her mid-30s. “I was young and rebelling against everything,” she says. “At the time I didn’t know much about Christianity and the church. But as a professor, I studied saints and the history of the church and this got me closer to it again.”

 

Her university years coincided with the growing feminist movement in Italy in the late 1960s, and she became an active campaigner. “I got involved in political life at university and went to gatherings, but I always felt out of place. There was hardly any talk or debate about women,” she says. “But at feminist meetings, they spoke about things that affected me and interested me. This is where I found the courage to start speaking publicly.”

 

Among these topics was sexual harassment. “I experienced sexual harassment, too. But in those times you didn’t report it, you just stayed silent and tried to avoid the person [who was harassing you].” Describing herself as a “critic of feminism”, Scaraffia is not without her contradictions. She was among the campaigners who fought to legalise abortion in Italy in the late 1970s, yet she is against terminating pregnancies.

 

“I’m against abortion because I think it’s bad, but I don’t think women should be criminalised for it,” she says. “Feminist movements, not all, make a big error in thinking that abortion should be a right, because it’s not like that. Abortion is painful for women, it’s a heavy load to carry. I’m not the only feminist who thinks this.”

 

Besides abortion, Scaraffia has taken issue with the morning-after pill, which she says “is not a victory”. In respect of birth control “everything is on the woman’s shoulders”, she says. “It’s not true that women want to act like men at the sexual level, ie be promiscuous. Instead they are pressured into taking contraceptive pills and the morning-after pill.” She believes that surrogacy, too, should be a feminist sticking point. “Wombs-for-rent has become a new slavery of the woman’s body in front of our eyes, and few feminists have rebelled.”

 

Perhaps most controversially, she believes that feminist campaigns around workplace parity and equal pay have “negated motherhood” in their quest for women to be equal to men. “There are many feminist movements, not just one type … I agree with those who give a lot of importance to motherhood.” She is dogmatic in her stance, which is difficult to swallow given it was feminists campaigning for better maternity rights that allowed women who work – like herself – to have children.

 

That said, her bravery in speaking out against the church’s abuse of nuns does have echoes of the #MeToo movement. But its fervour hardly reached Italy, let alone the Catholic church – and her reaction to it is again controversial. “In some ways #MeToo has been positive, for example in exposing people,” she says. “But there is also the issue of false accusations. This is a problem that needs to be recognised as not everything that people say is true.”

 

To speak to Scaraffia often feels like navigating a moral maze. One moment, you feel like you are talking to a classic women’s libber who is radically challenging the status quo of an arcane institution that actively excludes women with the remaining ban on women priests, the other she is damning #metoo. Her overall premise is, whether within the church or outside, that feminism isn’t about women being like men, but equal to men. For her, the biggest feminist victory has been education. “Women are much more educated now – if they win this, they win everything”.

 

One thing that she is clear on, however, is that women should not be pitted against each other. She claims that attempts to curtail the editorial freedom of Women Church World began when Andrea Monda, a Rome school teacher, was brought in to edit L’Osservatore in 2018 after Giovanni Maria Vian was sacked by Pope Francis after an 11-year term. Vian was also a fearless editor, not only introducing coverage of women’s issues but raising eyebrows by running a eulogy to Michael Jackson in 2009 as well as an article praising the Harry Potter series, and a book review on Oscar Wilde in which the Irish author was described as “one of the personalities of the 19th century who most lucidly analysed the modern world”.

 

Vatican women’s magazine hires new team after protest resignations. Monda is alleged to have exerted indirect pressure by hiring staff who Scaraffia described as “obedient” women “with an editorial line opposed to ours” to write for the main newspaper.

 

Monda denied interference in the editorial process, saying in a statement: “In the few months since I was appointed director, I guaranteed to Professor Scaraffia, and to the women’s editorial team, the same total autonomy and the same total freedom that have characterised the monthly supplement since the day it was born.” Monda added that the magazine would continue under a new team. “I can assure you that the future of the magazine is not in question,” he said. Last week, a new editor was appointed.

 

In the wake of the resignations, Scaraffia was criticised for her comments against the female writers introduced by Monda and accused of being a workplace prima donna. There has also been speculation that her bitterness derived from Vian’s dismissal and her subsequent loss of influence over some of L’Osservatore’s coverage. She dismisses the criticisms as “slanderous”, adding that she naturally feared changes after Vian left, as “he had always respected and supported our work”.

 

She is clearly disappointed that it ended this way, especially after founding the magazine. “The magazine was very much appreciated by my readers,” she says, adding that under her editorship it went on to be distributed in Latin America, Spain and France.

 

Her time may be over at Women Church World but Scaraffia is determined to continue her work. She meets regularly with her former colleagues at the magazine as they move towards setting up a foundation that would include the creation of a masters’ degree aimed at women working in the church. “The plan is to be able to teach all that we have accumulated.” It seems it would take a lot to keep Scaraffia quiet.

(theguardian.com)

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. George Nedumparambil says:

    Correction: "and god or her" should be read as "him or her".

  2. George Nedumparambil says:

    Gender equality is not contemplated in Bible and I believe even in Canon Law too.  But then none of these documents were written up for the 21st Century.  Church must recognise that every sovereign  country in the world has its own laws and that in case of conflict the sovereign law prevails.  It must recognise the fundamental rights of a person and god or her Human Rights. In my view any contract that  violates country's constitution and laws  is invalid.  So, the vows that aspirants to priesthood and nuns take to remain celibate could be invalid under national law and Church may not dismiss a priest or a nun married after becoming priest or nun.  

     

    Jesus didn't come to replace then existing priestly class with another set of priests.  Jesus didn't expect his followers to be unmarried either.  He was specific with regard to celibacy that it is meant for those who can accept it.  It follows then that a church that claims itself as inheritors of Apostle  Peter's legacy cannot create a new set of  rule to force celibacy and yet claim to be continuing in the footsteps of Jesus. 

     

    Jesus didn't create the concept of unmarried women (nun)  religious order in order to serve the  Lord.  According to Bible women's principal responsibility is to produce children for their husbands.  So all the nuns are technically going against god's vision for them.  

     

    I would think celibacy should be optional for priests and women religious (nun).  Let those who can't control the passion and  are burning for love and companionship have it and be allowed to marry.  This could possibly reduce priests preying on nuns as easy pickings.  Church should also elevate nuns to be able to perform all sacraments of the church and then some semblance of gender equality can be obtained. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

five × 5 =